0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 520 vs AMD Athlon XP 2200+ |
Released November, 2000
Intel Pentium 4 520
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 520
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 2200+ vs the Intel Pentium 4 520. | |||||||
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 520 vs Athlon XP 2200+
clock speed
Pentium 4 520
2.8 GHz
Athlon XP 2200+
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 520
1 MB
Athlon XP 2200+
0.25 MB
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 520 | vs | Athlon XP 2200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
462 | |||
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | N/A |
details | Pentium 4 520 | vs | Athlon XP 2200+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 266 MHz |
Intel Pentium 4 520 ![]() | AMD Athlon XP 2200+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
56 vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3200+ vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$54 | ||
340 vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
2600+ vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$163 | ||
945 vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
6010 vs 520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1BGHz vs 2200+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||