Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 516

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 516

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C vs 64.4 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Celeron D 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 360

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 3.46 GHz vs 2.93 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.84 GHz vs 3.27 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 68.25W Around 25% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.38 GHz vs 2.93 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2006 vs Oct, 2005 Release date a year later

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 516  vs Celeron D 360 

clock speed

Pentium 4 516
2.93 GHz
Celeron D 360
3.46 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 516
3.27 GHz
Celeron D 360
4.84 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 516
2.93 GHz
Celeron D 360
4.38 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 516  vs
Celeron D 360 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 3.46 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 84W 65W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 533 MHz

details

Pentium 4 516  vs
Celeron D 360 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 188,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 26
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.32V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 64.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.27 GHz 4.84 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.93 GHz 4.38 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.27 GHz 4.84 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium 4 516
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 360
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus