Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 516

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 516

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.27 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.93 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron 2000E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 2000E

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much lower typical power consumption 30.06W vs 68.25W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Oct, 2005 Release date over 8 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.91 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 32.41 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 516  vs Celeron 2000E 

clock speed

Pentium 4 516
2.93 GHz
Celeron 2000E
2.2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 516
3.27 GHz
Celeron 2000E
2.2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 516
2.93 GHz
Celeron 2000E
2.2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 516  vs
Celeron 2000E 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 37W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 8.91 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 32.41 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 30.06W

details

Pentium 4 516  vs
Celeron 2000E 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.27 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.93 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.27 GHz 2.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 400 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 900 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Intel Pentium 4 516
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 2000E
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus