Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 516

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 516

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.93 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 3x higher clock speed
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 68.25W 9.3x lower typical power consumption
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 67.7 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Oct, 2005 Release date over 5 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 9.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 9.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 516 vs AMD C 50

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 516  vs
AMD C 50 
Clock speed 2.93 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

details

Pentium 4 516  vs
AMD C 50 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 5
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.05 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6250
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 276 MHz

power consumption

TDP 84W 9W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 7.88 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 7.31W
Intel Pentium 4 516
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Please i would like to know, between AMD C-50 processor 1.00 GHz and Intel Pentium 4 which one is good or ahead?
comments powered by Disqus