CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 511 vs 430 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 511

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 511

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 96,300 MB/s vs 74,150 MB/s Around 30% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C vs 60.4 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Celeron M 430

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 430

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 68.25W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Apr, 2007 vs Oct, 2005 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 1.73 pt/W vs 0.95 pt/W Around 85% better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.67 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 511 vs Celeron M 430

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium 4 511
96,300 MB/s
Celeron M 430
74,150 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 511  vs
Celeron M 430 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 84W 35W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 0.95 pt/W 1.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium 4 511  vs
Celeron M 430 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 21 9
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1 - 1.34V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 60.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.53 GHz 3.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 3.67 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz 3.43 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium 4 511
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 430
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus