CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 511 vs 350 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron D 350 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron D 350  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 511

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 511

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz vs 3.2 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C vs 67 °C Almost the same
Front view of Intel Celeron D 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 350

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 4.04 pt/W vs 0.95 pt/W More than 4.2x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 17.06W vs 68.25W 4x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.06 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 18.4 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 511  vs Celeron D 350 

clock speed

Pentium 4 511
2.8 GHz
Celeron D 350
1.3 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 511
3.53 GHz
Celeron D 350
3.2 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 511
2.8 GHz
Celeron D 350
3.2 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 511  vs
Celeron D 350 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 84W 21W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 5.06 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 18.4 $/year
Performance per watt 0.95 pt/W 4.04 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 17.06W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 533 MHz 400 MHz

details

Pentium 4 511  vs
Celeron D 350 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 144,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 21 24
Voltage range 1.25 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.53 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz 3.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium 4 511
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus