Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 506

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 506

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 95,500 MB/s vs 46.6 MB/s More than 2049.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron N2806

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2806

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 3.66W vs 68.25W 18.7x lower typical power consumption
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much better performance per watt 7.48 pt/W vs 0.93 pt/W More than 8x better performance per watt
Newer Nov, 2013 vs Apr, 2005 Release date over 8 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 18.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 18.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,291.5 vs 719 Around 80% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 506 vs Celeron N2806

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium 4 506
95,500 MB/s
Celeron N2806
46.6 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 506  vs
Celeron N2806 
Clock speed 2.66 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
BGA 1170

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 84W 4.5W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 1.08 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 3.94 $/year
Performance per watt 0.93 pt/W 7.48 pt/W
Typical power consumption 68.25W 3.66W

details

Pentium 4 506  vs
Celeron N2806 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.85 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.67 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz 1.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A HD (Bray Trail)
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 756 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 756 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium 4 506
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2806
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus