0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 506 vs AMD Sempron 2500+ |
Released April, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 506
- 2.66 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 506
![]() | Much more l2 cache 1 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.66 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.85 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2500+
- 1.75 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2500+
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 47.94W | ![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 69 °C |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 51.68 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.21 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.66 GHz | vs | 1.75 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 2.21 GHz | Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | vs | 1.4 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Apr, 2005 | vs | Jul, 2004 | Release date 8 months later | |||
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 47.94W | vs | 68.25W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 69 °C | vs | 67.7 °C | Almost the same | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 51.68 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.21 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 506 vs Sempron 2500+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium 4 506
719
Sempron 2500+
556
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium 4 506
715
Sempron 2500+
546
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium 4 506
95,500 MB/s
Sempron 2500+
38.7 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 506 | vs | Sempron 2500+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 1.75 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
754 | |||
462 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
bus | |||
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 333 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 506 | vs | Sempron 2500+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 130 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | Unknown - 69°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.85 GHz | 2.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.67 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | 2.21 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 59W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 14.21 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 51.68 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.93 pt/W | 0.41 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 47.94W |
Intel Pentium 4 506 ![]() | AMD Sempron 2500+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$37 | ||
430 vs 506 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$33 | ||
336 vs 506 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
4800+ vs 506 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J1900 vs 506 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$74 | ||
820 vs 506 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
5005U vs 506 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Athlon XP-M 2500+ vs Sempron 2500+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||