Winner
Intel Core i3 3217U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 3217U based on its .
See full details Intel Pentium 3556U vs Core i3 3217U |
Released July, 2013
Intel Pentium 3556U
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
6.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 3556U
 | Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,006 | | Marginally newer Jul, 2013 |
VS
Released June, 2012
Intel Core i3 3217U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
6.3 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3217U
| | Is hyperthreaded Yes | | More l2 cache 1 MB |
| | More l3 cache 3 MB | | More threads 4 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 3556U vs 3217U
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU) and Passmark | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i3 3217UCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,006 | vs | 879 | Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marginally newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Jun, 2012 | Release date over a year later | |||
| |||||||
| Is hyperthreaded | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache | 3 MB | vs | 2 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Supports more RAM | 32,768 MB | vs | 16,384 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 3556U vs Core i3 3217U
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 3556U | vs | Core i3 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1168 | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 15W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 19.17 pt/W | 20.95 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium 3556U | vs | Core i3 3217U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 17 | 18 | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Pentium 3556U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 3217U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $225 | |
| 3217U vs 3110M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $75 | |
| 3217U vs 1007U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs 5050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 2117U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs 1450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 3217U vs 4010U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $340 | ||
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $340 | |
| 4670K vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $340 | $332 | |
| 4770K vs 4820k | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 3230M vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $240 | |
| 8350 vs 4670K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $378 | $378 | |
| 4700HQ vs 4700MQ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $393 | |
| 4200U vs 4500U | ||
