Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 350

Report a correction
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium 350  vs Celeron N3050 

clock speed

Pentium 350
1.2 GHz
Celeron N3050
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 350
1.2 GHz
Celeron N3050
2.14 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 350
1.2 GHz
Celeron N3050
1.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 350  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 6W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 5.26 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 4.88W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium 350  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.2 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.2 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 32,768 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Pentium 350
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus