Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Aug, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 17.06W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 5.06 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 18.4 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron M 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 360

Report a correction
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.83 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 4x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher clock speed 1.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Pentium 350  vs Celeron M 360 

clock speed

Pentium 350
1.2 GHz
Celeron M 360
1.4 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 350
1.2 GHz
Celeron M 360
4.83 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 350
1.2 GHz
Celeron M 360
1.4 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 350  vs
Celeron M 360 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1155
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 15W 21W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 5.06 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 18.4 $/year
Typical power consumption 12.19W 17.06W

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium 350  vs
Celeron M 360 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.2 GHz 4.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.2 GHz 4.83 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC Yes No
Intel Pentium 350
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 360
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus