CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2117U vs 3337U

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Core i5 3337U 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3337U  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Intel Core i5 3337U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 2117U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 2117U

Report a correction
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 3337U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3337U

Report a correction
Is hyperthreaded Yes vs No Somewhat common; Maximizes usage of each CPU core
More l3 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 3,145 vs 1,884.5 More than 65% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Better PassMark score 3,161 vs 1,660 More than 90% better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz vs 1.84 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 10% better turbo clock speed
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,133 vs 2,285 More than 80% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,262 vs 978 Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Better performance per watt 23.12 pt/W vs 15.6 pt/W Around 50% better performance per watt
Marginally newer Jan, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2117U vs Core i5 3337U

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Passmark

Pentium 2117U Core i5 3337U @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 2117U  vs
Core i5 3337U 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1023
Is hyperthreaded No Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s

details

Pentium 2117U  vs
Core i5 3337U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nms 22 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 18
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 105°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.84 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.84 GHz 2.7 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 17W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 4.1 $/year
Performance per watt 15.6 pt/W 23.12 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 13.81W

bus

Architecture DMI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 5,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Pentium 2117U
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3337U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus