Winner
Intel Pentium 2117U
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium 2117U based on its .
See full details Intel Pentium 2117U vs Celeron 1017U |
Released September, 2012
Intel Pentium 2117U
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
6.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 2117U
 | Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.85 GHz |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Celeron 1017U
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
6.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Celeron 1017U
| | Significantly better performance per dollar 3.39 pt/$ | | Marginally newer Jul, 2013 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2117U vs 1017U
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| 3DMark06 (CPU) and Passmark | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Power Consumption | |
How much power does the processor require? | |
| TDP | |
Features | |
How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product? | |
| Features and specifications that differ between products | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Pentium 2117UCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.85 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 3.39 pt/$ | vs | 2.05 pt/$ | More than 65% better performance per dollar | |||
| Marginally newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Sep, 2012 | Release date 9 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2117U vs Celeron 1017U
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 2117U | vs | Celeron 1017U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB | |
details | Pentium 2117U | vs | Celeron 1017U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nms | 22 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.85 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.85 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 17W | 17W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 16.18 pt/W | 14.95 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
 Intel Pentium 2117U  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron 1017U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2117U vs 2310M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2117U vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $134 | |
| 2117U vs 2020M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $75 | |
| 2117U vs 1007U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2117U vs 3227U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2117U vs 3110M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 2117U vs 3337U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $47 | $117 | |
| E3300 vs E4600 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $340 | ||
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $340 | |
| 4670K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $240 | |
| 8350 vs 4670K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $281 | |
| 3230M vs 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $340 | $332 | |
| 4770K vs 4820k | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | $393 | |
| 4200U vs 4500U | ||
