0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 2117U vs Celeron 1007U |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 2117U vs the Celeron 1007U. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron 1007U vs the Pentium 2117U. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2117U vs Celeron 1007U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium 2117U
3.08 mHash/s
Celeron 1007U
3.71 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Pentium 2117U
4.01 mPixels/s
Celeron 1007U
3.8 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Pentium 2117U
0.35 fps
Celeron 1007U
0.33 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium 2117U
2,488
Celeron 1007U
2,141
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium 2117U
1,451
Celeron 1007U
1,245
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Pentium 2117U
93,650 MB/s
Celeron 1007U
78,500 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Pentium 2117U
1,650
Celeron 1007U
1,399
PassMark (Single Core)
Pentium 2117U
978
Celeron 1007U
818
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 2117U | vs | Celeron 1007U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 17W | 17W | |
Annual home energy cost | 4.1 $/year | 4.1 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.2 pt/W | 4.38 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 13.81W | 13.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | DMI | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 5,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Pentium 2117U | vs | Celeron 1007U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 18 | 15 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.85 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.85 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Pentium 2117U ![]() | Intel Celeron 1007U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$40 | $134 | |
2310M vs 2117U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 2117U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $134 | |
2020M vs 2117U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $75 | |
3217U vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $75 | |
J1900 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1450 vs 1007U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $75 | |
847 vs 1007U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||