CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2117U vs 1450

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 2117U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 2117U

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1 GHz 80% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 400 MHz 2.5x better turbo clock speed
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 105 °C vs 90 °C More than 15% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
Better PassMark (Single core) score 978 vs 505 Around 95% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.84 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 85% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 300 MHz More than 15% higher GPU clock speed
Slightly better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,884.5 vs 1,439 More than 30% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz vs 1 GHz 80% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A6 1450

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 1450

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 6.5W vs 13.81W 2.1x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 25.16 pt/W vs 15.08 pt/W More than 65% better performance per watt
Newer May, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date 7 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 4.1 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2117U vs A6 1450

GeekBench (32-bit)

A6 1450
1,935

GeekBench

A6 1450
1,935

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Pentium 2117U
1,884.5
A6 1450
1,439

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 2117U  vs
A6 1450 
Clock speed 1.8 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 17W 8W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 15.08 pt/W 25.16 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 6.5W

details

Pentium 2117U  vs
A6 1450 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.84 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.8 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.84 GHz 1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 8250
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1066
Intel Pentium 2117U
Report a correction
AMD A6 1450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus