CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2020M vs E2-2000

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Pentium 2020M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium 2020M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium 2020M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 2020M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 700 MHz More than 55% better turbo clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,238 vs 468 Around 2.8x better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 538 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 3,156 vs 1,109 More than 2.8x better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better PassMark score 2,317 vs 840 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 1.78 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD E2 E2-2000

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 E2-2000

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Sep, 2012 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2020M vs E2 E2-2000

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Passmark

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 2020M  vs
E2 E2-2000 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.75 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Performance per watt 9.51 pt/W 7.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W

details

Pentium 2020M  vs
E2 E2-2000 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 24 75

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.78 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1.78 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 7340
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 538 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz 700 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Intel Pentium 2020M
Report a correction
AMD E2 E2-2000
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus