CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2020M vs P320

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PassMark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Pentium 2020M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium 2020M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium 2020M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 2020M

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,238 vs 669 More than 85% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Sep, 2012 vs May, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 2,317 vs 1,222 Around 90% better PassMark score
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 3,291 vs 1,974 More than 65% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz vs 2.11 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon II PCs P320

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II PCs P320

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 34.34 pt/$ vs 2.48 pt/$ More than 13.8x better performance per dollar
Lower typical power consumption 20.31W vs 28.44W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 6.02 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2020M vs Athlon II PCs P320

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy PassMark

PassMark (Single Core) Data courtesy PassMark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 2020M  vs
Athlon II PCs P320 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
S1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 35W 25W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 6.02 $/year
Performance per watt 9.49 pt/W 8.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 20.31W

details

Pentium 2020M  vs
Athlon II PCs P320 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.11 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 650 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz N/A
Intel Pentium 2020M
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II PCs P320
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus