CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2020M vs 5000

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

3DMark06 (CPU), Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Passmark (Single Core)

Power Consumption

How much power does the processor require?

TDP

Features

How does CPUBoss rank the features of each product?

Features and specifications that differ between products

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Power Consumption and Features

Winner
Intel Pentium 2020M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Pentium 2020M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium 2020M

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 2020M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 2020M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.55 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,238 vs 719 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction
More l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly lower typical power consumption 10.97W vs 28.44W 2.6x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Sep, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 20.46 pt/W vs 9.51 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.25 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 2.6x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 2020M vs A4 5000

GeekBench (32-bit)

A4 5000
2,499

GeekBench (64-bit)

A4 5000
2,720

GeekBench

A4 5000
2,720

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

A4 5000
2,038.5

Passmark

A4 5000
1,896

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 2020M  vs
A4 5000 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
rPGA 988B
BGA 769
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Pentium 2020M  vs
A4 5000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 90°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label HD Graphics Radeon HD 8330

power consumption

TDP 35W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 3.25 $/year
Performance per watt 9.51 pt/W 20.46 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 10.97W
Intel Pentium 2020M
Report a correction
AMD A4 5000
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus