0 Comments
| Intel N4200 vs N3710 |
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel N4200
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 28.3 | ![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 5.24 mPixels/s |
![]() | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,395 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel N3710
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the N3710
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel N4200CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 28.3 | vs | 25.2 | More than 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 5.24 mPixels/s | vs | 4.45 mPixels/s | Around 20% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,416 | vs | 3,149 | More than 40% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,395 | vs | 968 | Around 45% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Better performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | vs | 11.85 pt/W | More than 10% better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2016 | Release date 6 months later | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs N3710
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N4200 | vs | N3710 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.56 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | 11.85 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | N4200 | vs | N3710 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 2.56 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | 2.56 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 405 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 400 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel N4200 ![]() | Intel N3710 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
5005U vs N3710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | ||
N3700 vs N3710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N3060 vs N3710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | ||
2500 vs N3710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6100U vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N3350 vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
5005U vs N4200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Aj (01:03 PM, June 8, 2017)