Intel N4200 vs N3350 |
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel N4200
 | More cores 4 | | Better performance per watt 13.15 pt/W |
| | More threads 4 |
VS
Released July, 2016
Intel N3350
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the N3350
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel N4200CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | vs | 10.98 pt/W | Around 20% better performance per watt | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs N3350
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N4200 | vs | N3350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | 10.98 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | N4200 | vs | N3350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 2.31 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | 2.31 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel N4200  Report a correction |  Intel N3350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6100U vs N4200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs N4200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | ||
| 5005U vs N4200 | ||
 | VS | |
| N3710 vs N4200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| N3060 vs N3350 | ||
| | VS | |
| $275 | ||
| 5005U vs N3350 | ||
 | VS | |
| x5-Z8350 vs N3350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
