Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N4200

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N4200

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
Much better performance per watt 13.15 pt/W vs 6.15 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 9.75W 2x lower typical power consumption
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,395 vs 1,201 More than 15% better geekbench 3 single core score
Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 vs 3,964 More than 10% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 10.51 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 2.89 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel E3950

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3950

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 500 MHz vs 200 MHz 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Jul, 2016 Release date 3 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs E3950

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416
E3950
3,964

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395
E3950
1,201

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
E3950
972.3 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035
E3950
2,034

PassMark (Single Core)

N4200
852
E3950
709

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N4200  vs
E3950 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

N4200  vs
E3950 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 Intel® HD Graphics 505
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 500 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 12W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 10.51 $/year
Performance per watt 13.15 pt/W 6.15 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 9.75W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N4200
Report a correction
Intel E3950
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus