Intel N4200 vs E3930 |
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel N4200
 | Much better performance per watt 13.15 pt/W | | Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 |
| | Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,395 | | More cores 4 |
VS
Released October, 2016
Intel E3930
- 1.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the E3930
| | Higher clock speed 1.3 GHz | | Significantly higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz |
| | Newer Oct, 2016 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | vs | 5.48 pt/W | Around 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,416 | vs | 1,531.5 | Around 3x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,395 | vs | 835 | More than 65% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.3 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2016 | Release date 3 months later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs E3930
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N4200 | vs | E3930 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | N4200 | vs | E3930 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 6.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.57 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 5.69 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | 5.48 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 5.28W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel N4200  Report a correction |  Intel E3930 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel N4200 vs Core i3 6100U | ||
| | VS |  |
| Intel N4200 vs N3350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| Intel N4200 vs N3710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| Intel N4200 vs Core i3 5005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| Intel N4200 vs N3450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel N4200 vs Core i5 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| Intel N4200 vs x5-Z8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
