CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N4200 vs T6570 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel N4200 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel N4200  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N4200

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N4200

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per watt 13.15 pt/W vs 2.5 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 28.44W 5.8x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 vs 2,005 Around 2.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Apr, 2009 Release date over 7 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,395 vs 1,132 Around 25% better geekbench 3 single core score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 5.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T6570

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T6570

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,820 vs 28.3 More than 64.2x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs Core2 Duo T6570

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
Core2 Duo T6570
90,450 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N4200
28.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N4200  vs
Core2 Duo T6570 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 13.15 pt/W 2.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 28.44W

details

N4200  vs
Core2 Duo T6570 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz 2.46 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz 2.46 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N4200
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo T6570
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus