CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N4200 vs 2670QM among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 2670QM 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 2670QM  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Core i7 2670QM

Intel Core i7 2670QM

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 36.56W 7.5x lower typical power consumption
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Oct, 2011 Release date over 4 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score 62.54 fps vs 48.34 fps Around 30% better CompuBench 1.5 ocean surface simulation score
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 10.84 $/year 7.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 39.42 $/year 7.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 2670QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2670QM

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz 2x higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 200 MHz 3.2x higher GPU clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,399 vs 852 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 5,923 vs 2,035 Around 3x better PassMark score
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Better performance per watt 14.38 pt/W vs 13.15 pt/W Around 10% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.69 GHz vs 2.39 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs Core i7 2670QM

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

N4200
62.54 fps
Core i7 2670QM
48.34 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
Core i7 2670QM
1,940,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035

PassMark (Single Core)

N4200
852

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N4200  vs
Core i7 2670QM 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 45W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 13.15 pt/W 14.38 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 36.56W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

N4200  vs
Core i7 2670QM 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz 2.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 HD Graphics 3000
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 650 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel N4200
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 2670QM
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus