Intel N4200 vs Core i5 520UM |
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel N4200
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz | | Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 |
VS
Released January, 2010
Intel Core i5 520UM
- 1.07 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 520UM
| | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,492 | | Supports trusted computing Yes |
| | Significantly better performance per watt 17.43 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel N4200CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,416 | vs | 2,151 | More than 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | vs | 1.07 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 14.63W | 3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Slightly higher GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | vs | 166 MHz | More than 20% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Slightly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,395 | vs | 1,210 | More than 15% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 15.77 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 4.34 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 1,492 | vs | 28.3 | Around 52.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 17.43 pt/W | vs | 13.15 pt/W | Around 35% better performance per watt | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs Core i5 520UM
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N4200 | vs | Core i5 520UM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | 17.43 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 14.63W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | N4200 | vs | Core i5 520UM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | 1.07 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 166 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel N4200  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 520UM Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| N4200 vs 6100U | ||
| | VS |  |
| N4200 vs N3350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| N4200 vs N3710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| N4200 vs 5005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| N4200 vs N3450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| N4200 vs 6200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| N4200 vs x5-Z8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
