Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N4200

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N4200

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 vs 2,151 More than 2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz vs 1.07 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jan, 2010 Release date over 6 years later
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 14.63W 3x lower typical power consumption
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 200 MHz vs 166 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed
Slightly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,395 vs 1,210 More than 15% better geekbench 3 single core score
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 15.77 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 4.34 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 520UM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 520UM

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,492 vs 28.3 Around 52.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Significantly better performance per watt 17.43 pt/W vs 13.15 pt/W Around 35% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs Core i5 520UM

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
Core i5 520UM
765,150 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N4200
28.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N4200  vs
Core i5 520UM 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.07 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.5 GHz 1.87 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 18W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 13.15 pt/W 17.43 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 14.63W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

N4200  vs
Core i5 520UM 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz 1.07 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.07 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz 1.07 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 166 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N4200
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 520UM
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus