CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N4200 vs E3845 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

N4200
5.2
N3350
5.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

N4200
6.1
N3350
6.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

N4200
n.d.
Atom E3845
n.d.
N3350
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

N4200
5.2
N3350
n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

N4200
8.4
N3350
8.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

N4200
n.d.
Atom E3845
n.d.
N3350
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

N4200
8.1
N3350
8.3

Winner
Intel N4200 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel N4200  based on its performance, single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N4200

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N4200

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 5.24 mPixels/s vs 1.12 mPixels/s Around 4.8x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,416 vs 2,624 Around 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,395 vs 818 More than 70% better geekbench 3 single core score
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 13.15 pt/W vs 11.4 pt/W More than 15% better performance per watt
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz vs 1.92 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.91 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 542 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 2.8x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.91 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs Atom E3845

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

N4200
6.63 mHash/s
Atom E3845
1.83 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

N4200
5.24 mPixels/s
Atom E3845
1.12 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

N4200
0.37 fps
Atom E3845
0.13 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416
Atom E3845
2,624

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
Atom E3845
317,450 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035
Atom E3845
1,466

PassMark (Single Core)

N4200
852

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N4200  vs
Atom E3845 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.91 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
EM64T
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 13.15 pt/W 11.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

N4200  vs
Atom E3845 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz 1.92 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.91 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz 1.92 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 HD
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 542 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N4200
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus