0 Comments
| Intel N4200 vs 7100U |
Released July, 2016
Intel N4200
- 1.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel N4200
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 4.88W |
VS
Released July, 2016
Intel 7100U
- 2.4 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 7100U
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 52.7 | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 12.14 fps | ![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,377 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel 7100UCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 12.19W | 2.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
Better performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | vs | 11.22 pt/W | More than 15% better performance per watt | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 52.7 | vs | 28.3 | More than 85% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | 12.14 fps | vs | 4.45 fps | Around 2.8x better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,377 | vs | 852 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 50% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 5,039 | vs | 4,416 | Around 15% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs 7100U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N4200 | vs | 7100U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 13.15 pt/W | 11.22 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | N4200 | vs | 7100U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.39 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.39 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 505 | Intel® HD Graphics 620 | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 300 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel N4200 ![]() | Intel 7100U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i3 6100U vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel N3350 vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel N3710 vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
Intel Core i3 5005U vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel N3450 vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs N4200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i3 6100U vs 7100U | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||