Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N4200

Front view of Intel N4200
Front view of Intel 7100U

Intel 7100U

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N4200

Reasons to consider the
Intel N4200

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Better performance per watt 13.15 pt/W vs 11.22 pt/W More than 15% better performance per watt
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel 7100U

Reasons to consider the
Intel 7100U

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 52.7 vs 28.3 More than 85% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 12.14 fps vs 4.45 fps Around 2.8x better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,377 vs 852 More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz vs 200 MHz 50% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 5,039 vs 4,416 Around 15% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N4200 vs 7100U

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

N4200
6.63 mHash/s
7100U
28.75 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

N4200
5.24 mPixels/s
7100U
24.29 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

N4200
0.37 fps
7100U
1.47 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
4,416
7100U
5,039

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,395
7100U
2,361

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N4200
1,120 MB/s
7100U
3,310 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N4200
2,035
7100U
3,846

PassMark (Single Core)

N4200
852
7100U
1,377

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 N4200  vs
7100U 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 13.15 pt/W 11.22 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 N4200  vs
7100U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.39 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.39 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 505 Intel® HD Graphics 620
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 300 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel N4200
Report a correction
Intel 7100U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss