Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3450

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3450

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3450

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3450

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 8 years later
Significantly better performance per watt 12.7 pt/W vs 8.02 pt/W Around 60% better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark (Single core) score 714 vs 248 Around 3x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 1,768 vs 281 More than 6.2x better PassMark score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Atom Z530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z530

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.65 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3450 vs Atom Z530

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3450
1,768
Atom Z530
281

PassMark (Single Core)

N3450
714
Atom Z530
248

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3450  vs
Atom Z530 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 2W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 0.48 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 1.75 $/year
Performance per watt 12.7 pt/W 8.02 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 1.63W

details

N3450  vs
Atom Z530 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.65 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.1 GHz 1.65 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3450
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z530
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus