Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Mar, 2009 Release date over 7 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz vs 1.57 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Slightly better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W vs 10.37 pt/W More than 5% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Core2 Solo SU3500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Solo SU3500

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the N3350  vs Core2 Solo SU3500 

clock speed

N3350
1.1 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

N3350
2.31 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

N3350
1.1 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
Core2 Solo SU3500 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 5.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 4.82 $/year
Performance per watt 10.98 pt/W 10.37 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 4.47W

details

N3350  vs
Core2 Solo SU3500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 3 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 1.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 1.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3350
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Solo SU3500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus