Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Apr, 2007 Release date over 9 years later
Much better performance per watt 10.99 pt/W vs 3.61 pt/W More than 3x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 28.44W 5.8x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 5.8x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo T7300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo T7300

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 80% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,867 vs 763 Around 2.5x better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 5,169 vs 1,128 More than 4.5x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 3.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs Core2 Duo T7300

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3350
1,128

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
Core2 Duo T7300 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 10.99 pt/W 3.61 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 28.44W

details

N3350  vs
Core2 Duo T7300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.29 GHz 2.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.29 GHz 2.33 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3350
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo T7300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus