Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W vs 2 pt/W Around 5.5x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 5 years later
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 14.63W 3x lower typical power consumption
Better PassMark (Single core) score 763 vs 474 More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 200 MHz vs 166 MHz More than 20% higher GPU clock speed
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 15.77 $/year 3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 4.34 $/year 3x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron U3600

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron U3600

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs Celeron U3600

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3350
1,128

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
Celeron U3600 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 18W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 10.98 pt/W 2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 14.63W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

N3350  vs
Celeron U3600 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 1.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 166 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N3350
Report a correction
Intel Celeron U3600
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus