0 Comments
| Intel N3350 vs Celeron N3050 |
Released July, 2016
Intel N3350
- 1.1 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel N3350
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W |
![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 763 | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2016 |
VS
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron N3050
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | ![]() | Higher GPU clock speed 320 MHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.16 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better performance per watt | 10.98 pt/W | vs | 8.65 pt/W | More than 25% better performance per watt | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 763 | vs | 467 | Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.31 GHz | vs | 2.14 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
Higher GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 60% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.1 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs Celeron N3050
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
N3350
1,128
Celeron N3050
885
PassMark (Single Core)
N3350
763
Celeron N3050
467
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N3350 | vs | Celeron N3050 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 6W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.98 pt/W | 8.65 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | N3350 | vs | Celeron N3050 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.31 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.1 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.31 GHz | 2.14 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 200 MHz | 320 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel N3350 ![]() | Intel Celeron N3050 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$213 | $353 | |
750 vs 875K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$456 | $160 | |
3930K vs 8150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | ||
6300 vs 7th Gen A4-9120 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $134 | |
E7500 vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | $64 | |
G620 vs G3260 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $179 | |
E3400 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $912 | |
3470 vs X5450 | ||