Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W vs 7.82 pt/W More than 40% better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 763 vs 499 Around 55% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jul, 2014 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron N2940

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2940

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.83 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Higher GPU clock speed 313 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 55% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.25 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs Celeron N2940

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3350
1,128

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
Celeron N2940 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.83 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.25 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 6.57 $/year
Performance per watt 10.98 pt/W 7.82 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 6.09W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

N3350  vs
Celeron N2940 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 2.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 2.25 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 313 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N3350
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2940
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus