Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W vs 4.49 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Better PassMark (Single core) score 763 vs 398 More than 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz vs 1.75 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Atom E3827

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3827

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.75 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 542 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 2.8x higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.75 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs Atom E3827

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3350
1,128

PassMark (Single Core)

N3350
763

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
Atom E3827 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 1.75 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
EM64T
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 6W 8W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.93 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 7.01 $/year
Performance per watt 10.98 pt/W 4.49 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 6.5W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

N3350  vs
Atom E3827 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 1.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 HD
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 542 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N3350
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3827
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus