Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W vs 4.2 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 3 years later
Better PassMark (Single core) score 763 vs 551 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Atom C2558

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom C2558

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly better PassMark score 2,169 vs 1,128 More than 90% better PassMark score
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs Atom C2558

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3350
1,128
Atom C2558
2,169

PassMark (Single Core)

N3350
763

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
Atom C2558 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 10.98 pt/W 4.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

N3350  vs
Atom C2558 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 2.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 200 MHz N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 65,536 MB
Intel N3350
Report a correction
Intel Atom C2558
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus