Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3350

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3350

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3350

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 28.44W 5.8x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 10.98 pt/W vs 3.96 pt/W More than 2.8x better performance per watt
Newer Jul, 2016 vs May, 2012 Release date over 4 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 5.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD R R-464L

Reasons to consider the
AMD R R-464L

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 497 MHz vs 200 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 2,976 vs 1,128 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,015 vs 763 Around 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz vs 1.1 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3350 vs R R-464L

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3350
1,128
R R-464L
2,976

PassMark (Single Core)

N3350
763
R R-464L
1,015

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3350  vs
R R-464L 
Clock speed 1.1 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 10.98 pt/W 3.96 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 28.44W

details

N3350  vs
R R-464L 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.31 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.1 GHz 2.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.31 GHz 2.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 AMD Radeon HD 7660G
GPU clock speed 200 MHz 497 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Intel N3350
Report a correction
AMD R R-464L
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus