Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3160

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3160

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly better performance per watt 9.3 pt/W vs 5.48 pt/W Around 70% better performance per watt
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,964 vs 1,531.5 Around 95% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel E3930

Reasons to consider the
Intel E3930

Report a correction
Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz vs 320 MHz 25% higher GPU clock speed
Newer Oct, 2016 vs Jan, 2016 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3160 vs E3930

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N3160
2,964
E3930
1,531.5

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N3160
898
E3930
835

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N3160
364.4 MB/s
E3930
632.3 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3160  vs
E3930 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

N3160  vs
E3930 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics 500
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 400 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 6.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.57 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 5.69 $/year
Performance per watt 9.3 pt/W 5.48 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 5.28W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3160
Report a correction
Intel E3930
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus