Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3160

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3160

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 9.3 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 364.4 MB/s Around 156.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 2.24 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3160 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N3160
2,964

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

N3160
364.4 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3160
1,707

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3160  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.24 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 688 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

N3160  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 9.3 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3160
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus