Winner
Intel Core2 Duo P7350
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo P7350 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details Intel N3060 vs Core2 Duo P7350 |
Released January, 2016
Intel N3060
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
7.9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel N3060
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 9.13 mHash/s | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Released July, 2008
Intel Core2 Duo P7350
- 2 GHz
- Dual core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo P7350
| | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,785 | | Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB |
| | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3060 vs P7350 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 7.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 9.13 mHash/s | vs | 1.58 mHash/s | More than 5.8x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | vs | 3.08 pt/W | Around 3.8x better performance per watt | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 20.31W | 4.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 6.02 $/year | 4.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 21.9 $/year | 4.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 1,785 | vs | 20.1 | More than 88.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 2 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 788 | vs | 536 | More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Core2 Duo P7350
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N3060 | vs | Core2 Duo P7350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 25W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | 3.08 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 20.31W | |
details | N3060 | vs | Core2 Duo P7350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel N3060  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo P7350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| Intel N3350 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | ||
| Intel Core i3 5005U vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | ||
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| Intel N3710 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| Intel x5-Z8350 vs N3060 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
