Winner
Intel Core2 Duo P7350
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo P7350 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | Intel N3060 vs Core2 Duo P7350 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score 9.13 mHash/s | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,785 | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P7350CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | 9.13 mHash/s | vs | 1.58 mHash/s | More than 5.8x better CompuBench 1.5 bitcoin mining score | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much better performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | vs | 3.08 pt/W | Around 3.8x better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2008 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 20.31W | 4.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 6.02 $/year | 4.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 21.9 $/year | 4.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 1,785 | vs | 20.1 | More than 88.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 2 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 788 | vs | 536 | More than 45% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | N3060 | vs | Core2 Duo P7350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 25W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 6.02 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 21.9 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | 3.08 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 20.31W |
details | N3060 | vs | Core2 Duo P7350 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel N3060 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo P7350 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel N3350 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
Intel Core i3 5005U vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
Intel Celeron N3050 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel N3710 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel x5-Z8350 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | ||
Intel Core i5 2500 vs N3060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||