Intel N3060 vs Celeron SU2300 |
Released January, 2016
Intel N3060
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel N3060
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2009
Intel Celeron SU2300
- 1.2 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron SU2300
| | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,000 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Celeron SU2300CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | vs | 5.18 pt/W | Around 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Sep, 2009 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | vs | 1.44 GHz | Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.2 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 1,000 | vs | 20.1 | More than 49.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron SU2300
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N3060 | vs | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | 5.18 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 8.13W | |
details | N3060 | vs | Celeron SU2300 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 1.44 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | 1.44 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel N3060  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron SU2300 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| Intel N3350 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | ||
| Intel Core i3 5005U vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| Intel N3710 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | ||
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs N3060 | ||
 | VS | |
| Intel x5-Z8350 vs N3060 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
