Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Intel Celeron SU2300

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 11.43 pt/W vs 5.18 pt/W Around 2.2x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 1.44 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.2 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 1,000 vs 20.1 More than 49.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron SU2300

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N3060
20.1

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3060  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 11.43 pt/W 5.18 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

details

N3060  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 1.44 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus