CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3060 vs N3050 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3060

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3060

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 2.48 GHz vs 2.16 GHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Better performance per watt 11.52 pt/W vs 8.65 pt/W Around 35% better performance per watt
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 2015 Release date a year later
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N3050 vs the N3060.

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron N3050

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
9.11 mHash/s
Celeron N3050
6.95 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

N3060
4.6 mPixels/s
Celeron N3050
4.58 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
70.31 fps
Celeron N3050
66.12 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
0.45 fps
Celeron N3050
0.42 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
4.38 fps
Celeron N3050
4.19 fps

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N3060
20.1

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3060  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.48 GHz 2.16 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 6W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 11.52 pt/W 8.65 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 4.88W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

N3060  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus