Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 20.1 vs 18.5 Around 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Higher turbo clock speed 2.48 GHz vs 2.16 GHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Better performance per watt 11.43 pt/W vs 8.65 pt/W More than 30% better performance per watt
Better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.58 mPixels/s vs 4.48 mPixels/s Almost the same
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 2.14 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 2015 Release date a year later
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N3050 vs the N3060.

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron N3050

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

9.13 mHash/s
Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

4.58 mPixels/s
Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

69.16 fps
Celeron N3050
69.59 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

0.45 fps
Celeron N3050
0.44 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

4.42 fps
Celeron N3050
4.46 fps

3D Mark 06 (CPU)


PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


N3060  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.48 GHz 2.16 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 11.43 pt/W 8.65 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 4.88W


Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1


N3060  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1


Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Read more


Showing 2 comments.
Yes it's great for the price and if you plan on playing games in it then you can manage to run almost any game before 2012 at low or medium...
Is celeron n3060 is good
comments powered by Disqus