Winner
Intel N3060
CPUBoss recommends the Intel N3060 based on its performance and power consumption.
See full details | Intel N3060 vs Celeron N2840 |
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 20.1 | ![]() | Is unlocked Yes |
![]() | Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 4.58 mPixels/s | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.16 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
7.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 20.1 | vs | 12.9 | More than 55% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.58 mPixels/s | vs | 1.11 mPixels/s | More than 4x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | vs | 7.05 pt/W | More than 60% better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | 35% higher clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.17 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | N3060 | vs | Celeron N2840 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 311 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | N3060 | vs | Celeron N2840 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 2.17 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 7.5W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 1.81 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 6.57 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | 7.05 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 6.09W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel N3060 ![]() | Intel Celeron N2840 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $281 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Core i3 4010U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $161 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $17 | |
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
Intel Celeron N2840 vs N2830 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel N3060 vs N3350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
Intel N3060 vs Core i3 5005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||