CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3060 vs 743 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron M 743 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron M 743  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron M 743

Intel Celeron M 743

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 11.43 pt/W vs 2.92 pt/W Around 4x better performance per watt
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 1.3 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron M 743

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 743

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 581.5 vs 20.1 Around 29x better 3DMark06 CPU score

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron M 743

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N3060
20.1

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3060  vs
Celeron M 743 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 11.43 pt/W 2.92 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

details

N3060  vs
Celeron M 743 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 1.3 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 743
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus