CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3060 vs 3205U among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

N3060
5.1
N3350
5.2
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

N3060
5.7
N3350
6.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

N3060
n.d.
N3350
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

N3060
6.0
N3350
n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

N3060
6.7
N3350
6.7
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

N3060
n.d.
N3350
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

N3060
8.1
N3350
8.1

Winner
Intel N3060 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel N3060  based on its power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 320 MHz vs 100 MHz Around 3.2x higher GPU clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W vs 4.69 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 2015 Release date a year later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Celeron 3205U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3205U

Report a correction
Better PassMark (Single core) score 851 vs 536 Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron 3205U

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

N3060
4.6 mPixels/s
Celeron 3205U
6.12 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
70.36 fps
Celeron 3205U
89 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
0.45 fps
Celeron 3205U
0.51 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
4.38 fps
Celeron 3205U
-1 fps

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3060
991

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3060  vs
Celeron 3205U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 11.31 pt/W 4.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1

details

N3060  vs
Celeron 3205U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 1.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,384 MB
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3205U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus