CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3060 vs 1017U among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

N3060
5.1
N3350
5.2
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

N3060
5.7
N3350
6.2
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

N3060
n.d.
N3350
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

N3060
6.0
N3350
n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

N3060
6.7
N3350
6.7
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

N3060
n.d.
N3350
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

N3060
8.1
N3350
8.1

Winner
Intel N3060 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel N3060  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3060

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3060

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 11.31 pt/W vs 4.55 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score 4.38 fps vs -1 fps Around 550% better CompuBench 1.5 video composition score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Celeron 1017U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1017U

Report a correction
Better PassMark (Single core) score 853 vs 536 Around 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.18 pt/$ Around 3x better performance per dollar
Better 3DMark06 CPU score 26.8 vs 20.1 Around 35% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Slightly higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 10% higher GPU clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron 1017U

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
9.11 mHash/s
Celeron 1017U
3.69 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
70.36 fps
Celeron 1017U
77.07 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
0.45 fps
Celeron 1017U
0.38 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
4.38 fps
Celeron 1017U
-1 fps

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

N3060
20.1

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

N3060
991

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3060  vs
Celeron 1017U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 17W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 14.89 $/year
Performance per watt 11.31 pt/W 4.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

N3060  vs
Celeron 1017U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 1.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 350 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1017U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus