Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel N3060

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel N3060

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N3060

Reasons to consider the
Intel N3060

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 2.48 GHz vs 1.84 GHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Higher GPU clock speed 320 MHz vs 200 MHz 60% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Apr, 2015 Release date 9 months later
Slightly better PassMark (Single core) score 536 vs 389 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 1.53 GHz More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300

Report a correction
Better performance per dollar 0.73 pt/$ vs 0.18 pt/$ More than 4x better performance per dollar
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Atom x5 x5-Z8300

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
9.11 mHash/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
5.83 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

N3060
4.6 mPixels/s
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
3.93 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
70.36 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
62.92 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
0.45 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
0.41 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

N3060
4.38 fps
Atom x5 x5-Z8300
3.42 fps

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

N3060  vs
Atom x5 x5-Z8300 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.44 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.84 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

Typical power consumption 4.88W N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

N3060  vs
Atom x5 x5-Z8300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.48 GHz 1.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz 1.53 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 2,048 MB
Intel N3060
Report a correction
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus