Intel N3010 vs Atom C2308 |
Released January, 2016
Intel N3010
- 1.04 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel N3010
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
| | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Newer Jan, 2016 |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom C2308
- 1.25 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2308
| | Higher clock speed 1.25 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.25 GHz |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.25 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.25 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.25 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.25 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the N3010 vs Atom C2308
clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | N3010 | vs | Atom C2308 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.04 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 4W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.96 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 3.5 $/year | 5.26 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 3.25W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | N3010 | vs | Atom C2308 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.04 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.04 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.04 GHz | 1.25 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 10,666.66 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB | |
 Intel N3010  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2308 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| N3010 vs 2955U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| N3010 vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| N3010 vs J3710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $161 | ||
| N3010 vs N3700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| N3010 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| N3010 vs J1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| N3010 vs x5-Z8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
