Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel N2815

Reasons to consider the
Intel N2815

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 22 nms vs 32 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 1.86 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 28.44W 4.7x lower typical power consumption
Marginally newer Oct, 2013 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 4.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 4.7x lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD A6 3400M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3400M

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the N2815  vs A6 3400M 

clock speed

1.86 GHz
A6 3400M
1.4 GHz


A6 3400M

Specifications Full list of technical specs


N2815  vs
A6 3400M 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is hyperthreaded No No


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 28.44W


N2815  vs
A6 3400M 
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 22 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1


Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6520G
Intel N2815
Report a correction
AMD A6 3400M
Report a correction

Read more


comments powered by Disqus