Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel M3-7Y30

Reasons to consider the
Intel M3-7Y30

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron M 383

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 383

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 383 vs the M3-7Y30.

Features Key features of the M3-7Y30  vs Celeron M 383 

clock speed

M3-7Y30
1 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

M3-7Y30  vs
Celeron M 383 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

M3-7Y30  vs
Celeron M 383 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 4 1
Manufacture process 14 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 615 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 300 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 900 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 4.5W 5.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.08 $/year 1.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.94 $/year 4.82 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.66W 4.47W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel M3-7Y30
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 383
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus