Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3710

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3710

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 5.28W vs 77.19W 14.6x lower typical power consumption
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 5 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 11.51 pt/W vs 9.04 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.57 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 14.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 5.69 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 14.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 740 MHz Around 50% better turbo clock speed
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,857 vs 603 More than 3x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better PassMark score 6,257 vs 2,005 More than 3x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.21 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3710 vs Core i5 2500

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3710
2,005
Core i5 2500
6,257

PassMark (Single Core)

J3710
603
Core i5 2500
1,857

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

J3710  vs
Core i5 2500 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 6.5W 95W
Annual home energy cost 1.57 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.69 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 11.51 pt/W 9.04 pt/W
Typical power consumption 5.28W 77.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

J3710  vs
Core i5 2500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 4.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 3.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 405 Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed 740 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel J3710
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus